Understanding Pakistan Project

Understanding Pakistan Project Team November 5th, 2007

Reporting from the site of London Protest.

This 2:53 pm UK Time. I am sitting right now in front of the Pakistani Embassy in where the protest is going on. There are about 200+ people here. A while back a gentleman was singing a very beautiful “nazm” “Aisay dustoor ko mein nahin ma’anta” and the rest of the crowd was chanting with him. Local leaders are addressing the gathering. There is great sense of excitement. However, I am also thinking that somehow this is inadequate. We need to do more. When we talk about the people of Pakistan and on behalf of people of Pakistan, I keep on thinking as to where those people are? The majority of 160 million or so Pakistanis are still silent, as always.

No matter what we do here, and what we say, Pakistan will not get democracy unles Pakistanis–a vast majority of us–demand democracy. Where are the people???

As the imformation blockade continues in Pakistan, thoughts are racing through my mind at the speed of light. I will try to pen more of my thoughts on this blog in the coming days. Ahmad Faraz poker play moneypoker torneos gratistexas holdem estrategiastrip poker online gratis,poker online gratis,juegos online gratis pokerpoker online sinjugar a poker gratisjuego de poker pcpoquer com esfree poker playing online,free online poker,free online poker fake moneyfree texas hold em gamebest internet pokeronline poker gamblingtexas hold em gameonline texas holdem tournament,freeroll texas holdem tournament,texas holdem tournamentpoker software developeronline poker for funonline poker tourfree texas holdem poker download,free texas holdem poker,free texas holdem poker game7 card stud hands7 card stud oddsplay poker online,play poker,how to play three card pokeronline poker no downloadfree video poker game7 card stud hi lowonline poker softwarepoker game downloadpoker rule,5 card draw poker rule,strip poker ruleonline video pokeronline poker strategyinternet poker gameinternet poker softwarefree online poker tightpoker7 card stud softwaredraw pokerplay free poker onlinevideo poker softwarecrazy game of pokerplay video poker7 card stud gamesfree video pokerfree texas holdem poker playonline poker sitefree texas hold em pokerpoker casino gamefun game home play pokeronline poker freefree on line pokerbad credit card,approval bad card credit credit instant,bad card credit credit people ukcredit card consolidation loan,card consolidation credit interest loan low,card consolidation credit debt debt loancard compare credit uk has written the following about my country…

Meri bustee say paray bhi meray dushmun hongay    (There might be my enemies away from my land…)

Per yahan kub koi aghyaar ka lushkar utra                   (But when did a foreign army invade here….)

A’ashna haath hi aksur meri janab lupkay                       (It always familiar hands that attacked me…)

Meray seenay mein humaisha mera khunjar utra…        (It was always my own knife that tore through my chest…)

I leave you with Faiz’s famous poem “Hum Daikhain Gay” and its video depiction adopted from Adil Najam’s All Things Pakistan that comes to mind as a very apt representation of the present circumstances…

Signing off Now.

Athar Osama

P.S. I have a confession to make to UPP audience. I’ve been kept away from UPP for the last month or so because of some domestic issues. I intend to return to our Story of Pakistan as soon as I can–hopefully within a week or so. The battle for constitutional rights of Pakistanis must go on and is never ending. Our country needs us today more than ever before.

• Martial Law , Elections 2007 , Democracy , General Musharraf , 2007 , Constitution , Military , History in a Nutshell
• Comments(2)

Understanding Pakistan Project Team November 4th, 2007

By: Athar Osama

Pakistanis are joining hands to protest the recent actions of the Military Regime. They’re defying section 144 in Pakistan and holding protests in front of Pakistani Embassies around the world. This is all very necessary, but is also perhaps inadequate. Not only are our numbers inadequate but what we’re trying to do now is perhaps too little, too late.

What are we–the educated Pakistanis–to do? How are we to bring other Pakistanis along? Where are all the Pakistanis, in whose name we are demanding the restoration of democracy? These are questions that confuse us all and beg a thoughtful consideration. For example:

- What is the real cause of this emergency - Judicial activism or religious extremism?

- How should Pakistanis abroad react? Should we call attention of our host governments towards situation in Pakistan? Should we force them to take sides even at a detriment to Pakistan, as a whole?

- What can we do, other than protesting, in the short, medium, and long-run to promote democracy and constitutional rule in Pakistan?

- Can majority of the Pakistanis shed aside their differences and agree on a single point agenda for their country?

- How do we engage with the political leadership of our country? How do we, using the principles of Understanding Pakistan Project or others, engage with other Pakistanis?

A journey of thousand years begins with the first step and we must start taking our first steps now.

I believe that we need to go farther than we’ve ever gone before. The present crisis demands this. If we don’t act today, we may not get an opportunity to act for a decade.

I’ve often said that the parha-likha professionals of Pakistan–all of us–would have to throw away our complacency and get into the political field.

Understanding Pakistan Project is proposing a series of informal coffee meetings/chats to discuss the situation and strategize. This could, if the group agrees, launch one or more Understanding Pakistan Activism Committees that would attempt to take on the challenging of doing something — rather than merely reflecting.

The inaugural meeting is being held at a Convenient Starbucks in Central London on the coming Saturday (To be Announced to those who RSVP). Similar Meetings are planned in KHI, LHR, ISB in a couple of weeks (again RSVP here).

Please visit the event website on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=7161796721) and RSVP if you’re interested in attending or holding a similar event in your own locality. Please also consider passing on this information to others around you.

Come join us, hear and be heard, and join hands with others to begin the necessary process of grass roots political reform in Pakistan.

If there ever was time for action, it is now and here.

Pakistan Zinadabad

• Elections 2007 , Democracy , Civil Society , General Musharraf , 2007 , Politics , Military , Constitution
• Comments(0)

Understanding Pakistan Project Team October 7th, 2007

Guest Post: By Ayaz Amir

Published in Dawn.com (October 5, 2007) 

“Be patient now, my soul; thou hast endured much worse than this.” –– Odysseus

UNTIL now I never truly grasped the meaning of the Lawrence College motto, ‘Never give in’. When the sky is bright and the heavens are smiling these words mean nothing. They mean something when one is down and out, flattened by circumstances, the last shreds of hope leaving one’s heart.

Then to be able to hold up one’s head and look into the distance with firm eyes is the true test of manliness (or womanliness for that matter). Our circumstances are not promising. Indeed, the entire nation seems depressed. Abandoned to fools and knaves, sold to the United States and therefore not our own masters.

But other countries have undergone much worse. If Vietnam be too distant a memory, there are countries in Africa which have suffered genocide. Afghanistan next door has been destroyed by decades of strife and war. In Iraq hundreds of thousands have died since the American invasion. Millions have been uprooted from their homes. Truly, few hells are worse than those paved with American good intentions.

The Yanks mean well by us too. God help us. About the next army chief, Gen Kiani, it is being said that the Yanks are quite happy to work with him. What a certificate of commendation. Our problem, or at least one of our problems, is the Yank connection. And here we are putting new buckles on it and giving it a fresh coat of paint.

Anyway, what if the high hopes of this just-gone-by summer of discontent appear to have been dashed to the ground? What if the corridors of power remain packed with the same self-serving circus performers? What if the changes armchair revolutionists dreamed of have not come to pass? Progress has still been made and anyone who says we are where we were has not got the measure of things.

The citadels of power stand shaken by the events of this spring and summer. The army has felt the heat too, some of its confidence ebbing away. Is the chastening of authority, never before challenged in this manner, a small achievement?

Continue Reading »

• Elections 2007 , Democracy , General Musharraf , Military , Constitution , Guest Post
• Comments(0)

Understanding Pakistan Project Team October 7th, 2007

Guest Post By: Ardreshar Cowasjee

Published in DAWN, Oct. 7, 2007

SOME 59-odd years ago, Mussalman leader Abul Kalam Azad, a genuine true maulana, a profoundly educated man, who habitually and openly imbibed of that God-given fine malt drink and made no bones about it, was heard to murmur one balmy evening, `Ummmm, but we must not forget that India is a country whereas Pakistan is an experiment.’

It is truly amazing, and we must thank the Almighty and also founder-maker Mohammad Ali Jinnah, that despite the best efforts of all who have ruled over the past 60 tumultuous years, the experiment, though a failure, still exists in some sort of retarded embryonic form.

President General Pervez Musharraf, whilst discoursing last week before an audience assembled to hear him elaborate on Erra how successfully (truly) Pakistan dealt with the 2005 earthquake, sent out a message to the members of Pakistan’s civil society who tend to criticise and to moan and groan about the country’s lot, that they should not be pessimists, that they should not despair and not spread despondency. As exhorted friend Pundit Ayaz Amir wrote in this space last Friday — `Never say die.’

We must at least congratulate ourselves that we are better than many other lands of our ilk — we at least do not eat each other, we may kill and maim but we stop there. Our president merely tried to humiliate his Chief Justice and has ended up ruing the day. In some countries in the Third World chief justices are often last seen or heard of when the president or king is having his breakfast. After that, they simply disappear.

Much praise must be rendered to Chief Justice of Pakistan Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry who very correctly has desisted from presiding over the benches adjudging the petitions involving the president and his legitimacy to stand for re-election. And more praise to him for having his priorities right — he is worried about the fate of the `disappeared’, the missing citizens of Pakistan casually picked up and either hidden away or killed by our fearsome `agencies’. More power to his elbow!

Continue Reading »

• Elections 2007 , Democracy , General Musharraf , Politics , Constitution , Guest Post
• Comments(0)

Understanding Pakistan Project Team October 2nd, 2007

Guest Post By: Advocate Muneer A. Malik

[Editor’s Note: This article was written by Mr. Muneer A. Malik in the heydays of the Presidential Reference against CJP. Its context, therefore, is different from the current Presidential Elections. However, given the fact that the Lawyers’ Movement has now extended to the Presidential Election, some of the arguments here are worth revisiting, especially, that there is nothing political or–depending upon how you see it–everything political about this movement. Mr. Malik basically argues, and rightly so, that the country’s politics and the fate of its Constitution are too precious to be left for others to decide and that everyone of us “has a dog in this fight”…]
THE reference against the Chief Justice has placed government spokesmen in a tricky spot. Early on, they realised that a direct attack against the Chief Justice would be imprudent. It would contradict their stated position that the president had simply put certain material about the Chief Justice before the Supreme Judicial Council for assessment and determination, and that the government was entirely neutral in the matter. How then would the government go on the offensive?

It was Information Minister Muhammad Ali Durrani, that fearless defender of downtrodden dictatorships, who arrived at an ingenious solution. Why not target the lawyers instead? After all, the whole fuss had been created by the bar associations (albeit fuelled by the media). If the legal community could somehow be discredited, the media would lose interest and the opposition parties would get distracted by other issues.

Unfortunately, the resultant government-generated propaganda aimed at discrediting the legal community has been blindly adopted by some in the ostensibly independent media. Even reputed columnists of this paper have chosen to attack the acts of the protesting advocates rather than the cause of these protests.

While devoting all its energy to the single-minded defence of the Chief Justice, the legal community neglected to explain its own actions to the public and left itself open to attack. This article aims at remedying that failure.

The first charge against the bar associations is that they have unduly politicised an issue that should, more properly, be a subject of pure constitutional and judicial debate. Let there be no doubt on this score; our struggle is political to the core.Our struggle is about the independence of the judiciary and the preservation of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. These are not arcane legal issues to be dryly debated in closed courtrooms. They are issues that affect the lives of every single Pakistani.

Continue Reading »

• Martial Law , Elections 2007 , Democracy , General Musharraf , 2007 , Constitution , Politics , Military , Guest Post
• Comments(0)

Understanding Pakistan Project Team October 2nd, 2007

Guest Post By: Pakistan Institute of Legislative Democracy and Transparency (PILDAT)

Starting with this first issue, PILDAT will circulate a weekly, and if required, more frequent Election Monitor to update the Citizens of Pakistan, Media and International Community about the Presidential and General Elections in Pakistan. The Issue 1 of the Election Monitor is devoted to assessing the prospects of the upcoming Presidential Election as a free and fair exercise. This issue of Election Monitor tries to explore the answer to the crucial question. What are the prospects for this crucial Presidential election to be free and fair? Following are some of the indicators which may shed some light on what kind of Presidential Election one may expect on October 6, 2007.

Generally Presidential Election is not of critical importance in a Parliamentary Democracy – the system Pakistan espouses at least on paper. But given the special nature of the current political context and the explicit association of the incumbent President / Chief of Army Staff to the current ruling coalition, the upcoming Presidential election holds the key to the coming General Election. The outcome of the Presidential Election will, to a large measure, determine the result of the General Election – which can be held latest by February 2008. The election of Gen. Pervez Musharraf for a new 5-year term as President will send a clear message to the general electorate that in a patronage-based society like Pakistan, only a pro-Musharraf parliamentarian will have any chance to serve his/her electors while others in the opposition will not be able to ensure development, jobs, protection from state high-handedness, etc., for their constituents. That explains the unique significance of this Presidential Election in Pakistan which is scheduled for October 6, 2007 and this also explains why there were persistent suggestions to hold General Election ahead of Presidential Election.

[With that, here are some of the reasons why the upcoming Presidential Elections may or may not be “free and fair” as is necessary for a genuine transition from military to civilian rule…]

1.  Media is Generally Free and Vibrant: Both electronic and print media are generally free, vibrant and, at times, extremely critical of the Government. Despite reports that the Government resorts to behind-the-scene strong-arm tactics to pressurise owners, publishers, editors and reporters, the political debate in the media is generally open and apparently unrestrained.

Continue Reading »

• Elections 2007 , Democracy , PILDAT , Civil Society , Martial Law , General Musharraf , Constitution , Politics , Military , Guest Post
• Comments(0)

Understanding Pakistan Project Team September 25th, 2007

By: Athar Osama

[Note: While this editorial was being written, Justice Wajihuddin Ahmed has announced his candidacy for the President of Pakistan as a consensus candidate of the judicial community. If nothing else, this makes a bold and daring statement that men of principle are still willing to take on the mighty and the uniformed. A man of integrity and principles, we wish Justice Wajihuddin best of luck of luck in his endeavor - Ed.] 

With the date for the Presidential Elections now being announced for Oct 6, 2007, the year-long speculation about whether or not General Musharraf will (or will be able to) seek another term in office is coming to an end. Barring any fresh legal or political challenges which are likely, but not certain, Presidential Elections WILL be held on Oct 6, 2007 and in all likelihood, General Musharraf, in violation of the Constitution of Pakistan, WILL still be holding another “office of profit”, namely, his position as Chief of Army Staff at the time of his re-election.

Whether or not he will give up his uniform after–and only if–he is re-elected as President of Pakistan for a second term is really immaterial. Having used every potential trick under his sleeve to first usurp power from its rightful owners–the people of Pakistan and their democtracally elected representatives–and then legimitize his rule through farce–and perhaps rigged–Presidential Referendum and then a democratic facade, the General is now well on his way to using his uniform to threaten, bully, and harrass all his political opponents and to-be defectors from his own party–but most importantly, the people of Pakistan–to “elect” him to office once again.

If one decides to discount the increasingly irritated and hostile public opinion, as evidenced by the Lawyer’s Movement earlier this year, and the increasingly independent Supreme Court as a result, the election of the President on October 6th seems like a foregone conclusion.  It would, however, be rather unwise and shortsighted to discount these recent developments so easily. In this Special Edition of Understanding Pakistan, we look at the Politics of Wardi in the lead up to the proposed Presidential Elections in October 2007. More specifically:

• Justice (Retd) Wajihuddin Ahmed, one of the few honorable Justices of the Supreme Court of Pakistan who refused to take an oath of allegiance under General Musharraf’s Provisional Constitutional Order (PCO) and chose to retire instead, in article written in May 2007, talks about the Constitutional Position on Presidential Elections. While  some of what Justice Ahmed speculates about is now established reality, his article is refreshing as it is informative about the issues that confront our Supreme Court today… 
• Salman Akram Raja, an advocate of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, takes a look at the issues involved in the election of the Incumbant and the challenges that Supreme Court faces in the ongoing legal battle today. The author presents an interesting set of legal arguments including some legal precedence by this very Court that may have restricted the options that the Court now has to rule against the dual office of the President….
• Syed Sharifuddin, a Constitutional Advisor to the Commonwealth Secretariat in London, again addressing the issue of General Musharraf’s re-election brings to bear some international legal practice and evidence to the question. It engages in an interesting legal jugglery to, on the one hand, encourage the current regime to follow the Constitution and stand-down and, on the other hand, to cajole them into avoiding adopting extra-legal means to (once again) subvert the Constitution….
• Athar Osama, in a “History of Failure: The Rise and Fall of Military “Experiment” in Pakistan” argues against the futility of electing a President in Uniform and carrying on with the painful and useless exercise of trying to create a better democracy by practicsing dictatorship–a process whose greatest affectees are the Pakistani people themselves…

Before we provide Understanding Pakistan’s own assessment of the likely Politics of Wardi, we leave you with this somewhat humorous but mostly ironic parody of General Musharraf’s insistence on clinging onto his Khakis. One particular thing that caught my eye and attention as I watched this was a placard that said: “Apne Mulk ko Fatah Kerna Bund Kero”

Returning back to our own analysis, we believe that the potential challenges to the President’s Election can come from four different sources, namely, legal, political, people, and institutional (the army). We describe each in more detail and rate these according to their likelihood and impact.

Continue Reading »

• Elections 2007 , Democracy , General Musharraf , Military , Constitution , Politics , Editorial Comment
• Comments(0)

Understanding Pakistan Project Team September 23rd, 2007

Guest Post By: Salman Akram Raja

THE question of General Musharraf’s eligibility or otherwise for re-election as president in uniform will depend critically on the interpretation of Article 43 of the Constitution that is ultimately adopted by the Supreme Court. Article 43 states that “the president shall not hold any office of profit in the service of Pakistan.” It is settled law that candidates for election must be free from conditions that render them ineligible on the date of filing of nomination papers.

Can Article 43 be read as imposing a pre-election ineligibility condition or does it apply only after a person has been elected as president, requiring him to relinquish an office of profit held by him at the time of his election? In answering these questions, the overall scheme of the Constitution must be considered.

Article 41(2) states that a person shall not be qualified for election as president unless he is qualified to be elected as member of the National Assembly. Qualifications for election as member of the National Assembly are given in Article 62 while applicable disqualifications are listed in Article 63. For a person to be elected as member of the National Assembly he must fulfil the qualifications of Article 62 and be free of the disqualifications of Article 63.

On this basis it can be reasonably argued that a person may not be elected president unless he is both qualified in terms of Article 62 and not disqualified in terms of Article 63. Article 63(1)(d), if read with Article 41(2), disqualifies any person from being elected the president of the country if “he holds an office of profit in the service of Pakistan other than an office declared by law not to disqualify its holder.”

Since Article 63(1)(d) would, if applicable to the president’s election, disqualify a person holding an office of profit from being a candidate the possibility of a person becoming president-elect while holding such an office would stand obviated.If this interpretation is accepted then pre-election candidature requirements stand entirely determined by Articles 62 and 63 while the role of Article 43 in the constitutional scheme is narrowed down to a specification of post-election restrictions applicable to the office of the president.

This, however, is not the interpretation accepted by the superior courts of Pakistan.

Continue Reading »

• Elections 2007 , Democracy , General Musharraf , Military , Constitution , Politics , Guest Post
• Comments(0)

Understanding Pakistan Project Team September 23rd, 2007

Guest Post By: Syed Sharfuddin

THE Constitution of Pakistan lays down three clear requirements for the office of president. The first is that he will be elected. The second requirement is that he should hold office for a term of five years. The third requirement is that he should not be eligible for re-election after remaining president for more than two consecutive terms.

The first requirement (the source of the current president’s power), in the event of his non-election, derives from the democratic mandate he received from the people of Pakistan in the referendum of April 2002 in which he was the sole candidate. The president subsequently received a vote of confidence by the parliamentary electoral college through a special session of each House of parliament and each provincial assembly in January 2004. Neither of these actions could satisfy the election requirement stipulated in Article 41 of the Constitution until this article was given a soft landing by adding clauses (7), (8) and (9) through the Constitution (Seventeenth Amendment) act 2003. Thankfully, these clauses are valid only for the current term of the president’s office.

On the second requirement, there is a great deal of confusion over when it began and when it would expire. This is because General Musharraf has been in power for more than seven years and has worn several hats during this period, including that of president.

The establishment view is that the current term of president began on November 16, 2002, and is set to expire on November 15, 2007. The next president of Pakistan should be chosen by the assemblies some time between September 15 and October 15, 2007.

As former Supreme Court judge Wajihuddin Ahmad’s recent appraisal of the Constitution has shown, there are several intentional or residual anomalies in Chapter 1 of Part 3 of the Constitution. When the time comes to invoke these in the application of law, these are most likely to lend themselves to political interpretation instead of standing on their own legal ground.

Like the act pertaining to the president’s holding of another office, the current parliament can be called upon to give legal cover to a political interpretation of how the issue of the term of president and his re-election is to be presented to the nation. Given the record of past legislation, it is most unlikely that the parliament will deny the government what it wants.

So how can politics influence a debate which is purely a matter of law? The previous occupiers of this post have not left a healthy precedent to guide the nation in this regard.

Continue Reading »

• Elections 2007 , Democracy , Martial Law , General Musharraf , Politics , Military , Constitution
• Comments(0)

Athar Osama August 24th, 2007

By: Athar Osama

One of things that I’ve often said in my writings (and otherwise) about Pakistan’s messy and un-inspiring politics is that it is one dominated by personalities rather than issues. In Pakistan, personalities, in the absence of checks and balances, have often become bigger than institutions with the result that we have failed–in the 60 year old history of our country–in creating institutions. This alone has caused immeasurable damage to the country over time.

(The picture of Bhutto and Zia on the right is one my favorite and most “prized” pictures of Pakistan’s history. It reflects, to my mind, all that is wrong about Pakistani politics and its politicians. Misplaced loyalties, individuals over institutions, virtually all of it, in just one simple graphic. This, unfortunately, is the story of Pakistan’s politics being repeated over and over again over the last 60 years. This is the kind of politics that we must all do our utmost to change)

I have a childhood friend–now a professor at British University– who was a die-hard People’s Party supporter and I remember having fiery discussions with him about the deeds and misdeeds of his cherished leader–Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto. He maintained, and probably still does, that Pakistan Peoples Party is the only true political party in the country and that all else is engineered by military dictators and intelligence agencies and hence is a hogwash.

With the recent talk of a deal between Benazir Bhutto and Musharraf, I decided to give him a call to see if he still stood by his leader. I wanted to know how he would now justify the actions of the Peoples Party leader Benazir Bhutto. Much to my surprise–a pleasant one, though–he was seriously reconsidering his support for Peoples Party and remarked: “ab tu saray hi aik jaisay hain ” (now all of them are the same!)

Anyways, his comment got me to begin thinking about what are the tell-tale signs of a leader’s insincerity and ultimate downfall–not just political leader, perhaps–but any leader and not just a leader in Pakistan but a leader anywhere. In other words, what are some of the signs that should tell you that it is time to ditch your favorite politician? Switch your political party? or demand a change in your party’s political leadership? If our politicians can switch their loyalties, why can’t we?

Drawing upon our rich and colorful political history, what criteria can we apply to make that decision? Based on my own limited reading of Pakistan’s history–through the Understanding Pakistan Project–here are Understanding Pakistan’s Seven Habits of Highly Dispensable Political Leaders: 

1. The leader acts as if he or she is bigger than institutions –This is one of the most long-held positions of Pakistan’s highly dispensable politicians. It is now so ingrained in our political psyche that Pakistan is left with no real (political) institutions today. The Election Commission, The Ehtesab Bureau, or The Supreme Court of Pakistan–we’ve seen it all and they’ve done it to all. Perhaps the most sacred of these institutions is supposed to the Constitution itself and when the Constitution is not safe from the whims and fancies of individuals, what is?

Continue Reading »

• Leadership , Democracy , Elections 2007 , Politics
• Comments(2)