Archive for the 'UPP Survey' Category

Aza’adi Special-Pakistan at the Crossroads: To be, But What to be? That is the Question!

Athar Osama August 14th, 2007

By: Athar Osama

Today is the Sixtieth Anniversary of the Independence of Pakistan. Today, sixty years ago, Pakistan came into being as a state established for the Muslims of the subcontinent to fashion their lives according the requirements of their own religion. Sixty years have gone by and Pakistan has a come a long way from a weak and fragile–almost by design–state that was declared a geographical absurdity to one that has not only survived but, in some ways, thrived as well. In other ways, though, Pakistan continues to struggle to define itself till this day. It is a state where power belongs to a small elite group of individuals and not to the people. It is state where it cannot be said with surety and conviction that the govern-ors govern with the consent of the governed. It is a state where extreme poverty still exists for as many as half of the country’s population and a country that continues to score among the lowest in the world on key indicators of human development whether it is education, health, mortality or economic and political freedom–alongside countries of sub-Saharan Africa.

pk11-UPPPollonGovernanceSystems.JPGWhile we should all be thankful to Allah Almighty for giving us this piece of land, that we can call our home, and its people, our people, we should also not leave any stone unturned to make this piece of land the envy of the world. We are far from that aspiration and there is a long way to go. In fact, some of us may argue that we aren’t even moving in the right direction. Ironically, Pakistan is a country that has not yet come to terms with some of the most important questions that must define a country’s march into the future:

  • What is the purpose of its existence (e.g. Whether it was created as a state for the Muslims or an Islamic State?)
  • What should be the system of governance that would be put into practice (e.g. Democracy or Dictatorship), and
  • And how do we, Pakistanis, see Law and Constitution, whether the latter is a mere piece of paper to be followed, if convenient, and discarded, if necessary or defines “rules of the game” that must be adhered-to to bring order and stability to our lives.

No wonder then, that every now and then, we, Pakistanis, find our country at a crossroads. It is also no surprise then that on this–the 6oth Anniversary of Pakistan’s Independence–a lot of Pakistanis are asking themselves the same question. What was Pakistan created for and why does it exist? Understanding Pakistan has engaged with this debate before (here, here, and here) as we looked at the passage of the Objectives Resolution (here). We add two new perspectives to this debate in this Aza’adi Special Edition of Understanding Pakistan.

Continue Reading »

UPP Survey: How Should the CJP Saga End?

Understanding Pakistan Project Team August 3rd, 2007

By: Athar Osama 

In early June of 2007, with the Presidential Reference against the Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP), Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhary, before the full-bench of the Supreme Court of Pakistan (SCP), we asked our visitors the following question:

pk9-UPP-Survey1.JPGHow should the current constitutional crisis be resolved?

The visitors had five choices to pick from. These were:

  • CJP reinstated by the Court
  • Gen. Musharraf admits his mistake (and withdraws the reference)
  • CJP resigns from office and enters politics
  • Gen. Musharraf resigns as Chief of Army Staff
  • Caretaker government is installed

Clearly, the choices provided for the survey went far beyond the the legal domain of the current case in the Court and encompassed the potential far reaching implications of the decision itself. In doing so, they attempted to incorporate the considerable damage that the reference had already done to General Musharraf’s credibility among Pakistani and international audiences as well as his the hold onto power. Many of us also noticed, and felt quite dismayed, by the use of public office in open political activities that were below the dignity of these offices. These excesses were committed by both sides.

General Musharraf and his advisors wore military uniforms and used the perks and privileges of their offices to openly engage in political lobbying for the rigtheousness of the Presidential reference as did Chief Justice of Pakistan, Justice Iftikhar Chaudhary, who used all the perks, privileges, and protocols–atleast the ones that he could still afford to use–as he openly lobbied the nation for his innocence and against the sitting government. It was high political drama of the highest calibre never before witnessed in the state of Pakistan. Partly to incorporate this element into the equation, but also somewhat selfishly too, a demand was made by Mr. Altaf Hussain of the Mohajir Qaumi Movement (MQM) that should the CJP resign and enter politics, his party would support his case against the presidential reference. Of course, a similar offer should have also been made to the sitting General as well for he too, in the past, has been guilty of holding onto one office while lobbying for another. Understanding Pakistan readers saw it all coming…

Continue Reading »