<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Complete Text: Pakistan&#8217;s First Constitution of 1956</title>
	<link>http://www.understandingpakistan.com/index.php/complete-text-pakistans-first-constitution-of-1956/</link>
	<description>An Investigation into the Life and Times of a Nation</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 12:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: bukhari</title>
		<link>http://www.understandingpakistan.com/index.php/complete-text-pakistans-first-constitution-of-1956/#comment-102380</link>
		<author>bukhari</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.understandingpakistan.com/index.php/complete-text-pakistans-first-constitution-of-1956/#comment-102380</guid>
		<description>1973 COSTITUTION
The 1973 constitution’s Sovereign Code conflicts with the law of algorithm (restoring, comparing and balancing). The author of the constitution was completely alien to the principals of Sovereign Code. Thus he failed to synchronize the ideology and cultural code and could not design metonym common codes for the nation’s identity. The sovereign code of the constitution is copy of British sovereign code colored with French Sovereign Code without addressing antonym code of the two systems. Therefore it was not possible to synchronize its codes with our culture and ideology. The Constitution reflects the ignorance of the author toward the Metonym code, ideology code and the cultural code of democracy. This was the time when the nation had still not recovered from the shock of the disgraceful handover of one wing to the enemy. The disintegrated and frustrated nation was not in proper mind frame to adopt any new constitution.
A constitution is basically required to define the distribution of sovereign power amongst the various institutions.  Contrarily, however, the 1973 constitution gives absolute power to appoint the  COAS, the CJ, the Secretaries, the Ambassadors and the Ministers etc, along with the power to transfer and post people on other key jobs, to the Prime Minister or the President.  As a result, the nation gets blessed with, instead of Leaders, civilian dictators which situation attracts military coups.  It is, thus, evident that no constitutional amendment can defend/prevent a military coup without a redesigning of the underlying sovereign code.  
How long can we circumvent the constitution and end up with amendments and failures?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1973 COSTITUTION<br />
The 1973 constitution’s Sovereign Code conflicts with the law of algorithm (restoring, comparing and balancing). The author of the constitution was completely alien to the principals of Sovereign Code. Thus he failed to synchronize the ideology and cultural code and could not design metonym common codes for the nation’s identity. The sovereign code of the constitution is copy of British sovereign code colored with French Sovereign Code without addressing antonym code of the two systems. Therefore it was not possible to synchronize its codes with our culture and ideology. The Constitution reflects the ignorance of the author toward the Metonym code, ideology code and the cultural code of democracy. This was the time when the nation had still not recovered from the shock of the disgraceful handover of one wing to the enemy. The disintegrated and frustrated nation was not in proper mind frame to adopt any new constitution.<br />
A constitution is basically required to define the distribution of sovereign power amongst the various institutions.  Contrarily, however, the 1973 constitution gives absolute power to appoint the  COAS, the CJ, the Secretaries, the Ambassadors and the Ministers etc, along with the power to transfer and post people on other key jobs, to the Prime Minister or the President.  As a result, the nation gets blessed with, instead of Leaders, civilian dictators which situation attracts military coups.  It is, thus, evident that no constitutional amendment can defend/prevent a military coup without a redesigning of the underlying sovereign code.<br />
How long can we circumvent the constitution and end up with amendments and failures?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zohaib</title>
		<link>http://www.understandingpakistan.com/index.php/complete-text-pakistans-first-constitution-of-1956/#comment-85396</link>
		<author>zohaib</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 14:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.understandingpakistan.com/index.php/complete-text-pakistans-first-constitution-of-1956/#comment-85396</guid>
		<description>where is Article 28</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where is Article 28</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
