<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Constitutional &#038; Political Challenges During Liaquat&#8217;s Premiership - 2/2 (1949-51)</title>
	<link>http://www.understandingpakistan.com/index.php/constitutional-political-challenges-during-liaquats-premiership-22-1949-51/</link>
	<description>An Investigation into the Life and Times of a Nation</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Atif Abdul-Rahman</title>
		<link>http://www.understandingpakistan.com/index.php/constitutional-political-challenges-during-liaquats-premiership-22-1949-51/#comment-42</link>
		<author>Atif Abdul-Rahman</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.understandingpakistan.com/index.php/constitutional-political-challenges-during-liaquats-premiership-22-1949-51/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>[quote]the religious establishment had started to severely criticize his wife—Begum Ra’naa Liaquat Ali Khan who was herself an economist, an educationist, and an important figure of the Pakistan Movement—for not observing purdah. The purpose obviously was to embarrass and weaken the Prime Minister himself.[/quote]

Maybe the overwhelming religious population didnt bind to the fact that the so-called 'Islamic' Republic was presenting a non-conservative brand of the state.

Secondly, the diversity of opinions in the first government leads one to think about how exactly was the first group came about? How come a Hindu minister represented the Law in a labeled Islamic state?

Some more commentary on the reasons why the Objective Resollution was passed into motion so quickly will be appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote]the religious establishment had started to severely criticize his wife—Begum Ra’naa Liaquat Ali Khan who was herself an economist, an educationist, and an important figure of the Pakistan Movement—for not observing purdah. The purpose obviously was to embarrass and weaken the Prime Minister himself.[/quote]</p>
<p>Maybe the overwhelming religious population didnt bind to the fact that the so-called &#8216;Islamic&#8217; Republic was presenting a non-conservative brand of the state.</p>
<p>Secondly, the diversity of opinions in the first government leads one to think about how exactly was the first group came about? How come a Hindu minister represented the Law in a labeled Islamic state?</p>
<p>Some more commentary on the reasons why the Objective Resollution was passed into motion so quickly will be appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

