<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guest Post: Genesis &#038; Ideology of Pakistan</title>
	<link>http://www.understandingpakistan.com/index.php/guest-column-genesis-ideology-of-pakistan/</link>
	<description>An Investigation into the Life and Times of a Nation</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: YLH</title>
		<link>http://www.understandingpakistan.com/index.php/guest-column-genesis-ideology-of-pakistan/#comment-39</link>
		<author>YLH</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 06:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.understandingpakistan.com/index.php/guest-column-genesis-ideology-of-pakistan/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Allama Pervez was economical with the truth in this piece... for example he neglects to mention from the speech he quotes (Delhi 1943) that Jinnah decried any idea of constitutional islamisation as nothing less than a "censure on every Muslim Leaguer".   Jinnah's idea of statehood was of a neutral impartial and unbiased entity... and not some kind of Islamic theocracy of Pervez's estimate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allama Pervez was economical with the truth in this piece&#8230; for example he neglects to mention from the speech he quotes (Delhi 1943) that Jinnah decried any idea of constitutional islamisation as nothing less than a &#8220;censure on every Muslim Leaguer&#8221;.   Jinnah&#8217;s idea of statehood was of a neutral impartial and unbiased entity&#8230; and not some kind of Islamic theocracy of Pervez&#8217;s estimate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

