<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guest Post: Jama&#8217;at e Islami and Religious Politics in 1950s</title>
	<link>http://www.understandingpakistan.com/index.php/jamaat-eislami-and-religious-politics-in-1950s/</link>
	<description>An Investigation into the Life and Times of a Nation</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Understanding Pakistan Project Team</title>
		<link>http://www.understandingpakistan.com/index.php/jamaat-eislami-and-religious-politics-in-1950s/#comment-2014</link>
		<author>Understanding Pakistan Project Team</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.understandingpakistan.com/index.php/jamaat-eislami-and-religious-politics-in-1950s/#comment-2014</guid>
		<description>Waheed: 

I've been meaning to do a piece of factually describing what is written in Justice Munir's report. I wanted to do it when we were covering 1950s but the pressure to move ahead stopped from doing it. To do justice to that report, one would really have to read through all the 300 or so pages (33 MB of it) and develop a summary. I've tried reading it, parts of it, with a view to extracting salient features point but found it quite difficult to do so. I would, however, definitely recommend it as a reading for anyone interested in the history of religious politics in Pakistan and hopefully be able to come back to it and write a summary post. 

If you have anything that summarizes it in good, factual, manner, please feel free to refer it to me as it would make my job a little easier. - Ed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waheed: </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to do a piece of factually describing what is written in Justice Munir&#8217;s report. I wanted to do it when we were covering 1950s but the pressure to move ahead stopped from doing it. To do justice to that report, one would really have to read through all the 300 or so pages (33 MB of it) and develop a summary. I&#8217;ve tried reading it, parts of it, with a view to extracting salient features point but found it quite difficult to do so. I would, however, definitely recommend it as a reading for anyone interested in the history of religious politics in Pakistan and hopefully be able to come back to it and write a summary post. </p>
<p>If you have anything that summarizes it in good, factual, manner, please feel free to refer it to me as it would make my job a little easier. - Ed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waheed</title>
		<link>http://www.understandingpakistan.com/index.php/jamaat-eislami-and-religious-politics-in-1950s/#comment-2009</link>
		<author>Waheed</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.understandingpakistan.com/index.php/jamaat-eislami-and-religious-politics-in-1950s/#comment-2009</guid>
		<description>Justice Munir report http://www.mediafire.com/?2lbjlhmslbj refutes some of the things that have been mentioned in this article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justice Munir report <a href="http://www.mediafire.com/?2lbjlhmslbj" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.mediafire.com');">http://www.mediafire.com/?2lbjlhmslbj</a> refutes some of the things that have been mentioned in this article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nazeer Ahmad</title>
		<link>http://www.understandingpakistan.com/index.php/jamaat-eislami-and-religious-politics-in-1950s/#comment-601</link>
		<author>Nazeer Ahmad</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.understandingpakistan.com/index.php/jamaat-eislami-and-religious-politics-in-1950s/#comment-601</guid>
		<description>This article leaves Jama'at Islami in a much better light than the usual image presented in the media. I am no supporter of Jamaat but after reading the article it seems that this party was the most comitted one to a constitutional struggle. What a pitty when a constitution was approved the bloody General couped and all struggle went in vain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article leaves Jama&#8217;at Islami in a much better light than the usual image presented in the media. I am no supporter of Jamaat but after reading the article it seems that this party was the most comitted one to a constitutional struggle. What a pitty when a constitution was approved the bloody General couped and all struggle went in vain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
